Are discussions about depopulation hyperbole?
Could world leaders really be advocating for fewer people on the planet?
Full disclosure, I think it is nearly inarguable to think other than, yes, some group of world leaders absolutely believe they are justified in calculating planned depopulation. I accept that some consider it a Noble Lie, that they think they are doing good work. I will post only a scratching of the surface of things I have seen or read during my Plandemonium truth journey.
Recently, I was reading the comments of an article where Mathew Crawford posited the argument that there must be some novel pathogen causing the phantom menace of Covid. The statement was something to the effect of “the flu doesn’t cause hypoxia or anosmia. . . “ Well, here in the internet age, when math, books, sleep, and monogamy are for losers and not for future bankrupted crypto charlatan fugitives, we can just whip out our mind erasers and discover that, lo and behold, low oxygen levels and loss or changes in sense of smell and taste have very well in fact existed before the Plandemonium and were and are incident to the same melange of respiratory distress the population has dealt with all the time.
Too lazy for the links -its a rough draft eh.
Ya know what else existed before the plandemonium? Lots of proof that some people believed in genocide as means to an end. Go figure. So why would they fake a pandemic and inject the world with a bioweapon? Was it money, well yeah to a point. What else could it be? What about depopulations? C’mon man, that makes no sense!
https://larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1981/eirv08n10-19810310/eirv08n10-19810310_028-the_haig_kissinger_depopulation.pdf
Here is one excerpt that seems somewhat telling and says so much about world events today.
. . . “the United States now shares the view of former World Bank President Robert McNamara that the "population crisis" is a greater threat to U.S. national security interests than "nuclear annihilation."
So who are the evil people?
Yeadon's analysis is spot on. These are Luciferians/Satanists who have done this.
Is it hyperbole? To some extent, yes. There has been talk of reducing the population for hundreds of years and the world population is higher than ever and still growing. Is there cause for concern? Yes, the quackcine campaign has been far stronger than in the past with no sign of the authorities acknowledging the harm and excess death. The main questions are will excess deaths plateau or increase and will people refuse further doses of quackcine? There is evidence of the latter.
If they are to reach a goal of a few billion less people, how will they do it and in what timeframe and at what cost to sustaining society? Is society as we know it compatible with such goal? They first have to reduce population growth to zero, that may be closer with recent reports on fertility, but still a ways off.
Or is what we are seeing the last gasps of a dying approach to human health?